Fashion shows have become more than just models walking down
a runway, they are a full stage production of lighting, music, props and art.
Designers use fashion shows not only to showcase their latest designs, however,
use the runway to create a mood around the garments and to give insight into
the designers concepts, inspirations and creative processes. Additionally,
these often overtly theatrical events gain media attention and publicity for
the brand.
An
example of fashion as spectacle can be seen in John Gallianos 1998 Spring-Summer Hourte Couture
show for Dior. The fashion show was a reenactment of the eighteenth century
princess and the pea scenario and was an overtly theatrical and lavish event.
Gallianos transformation of space involved defacing its real characteristics in
the interest of imposing his own fantasy vision on the space, weaving
mythologies and creating something out of nothing (Evans 2003, p. 67). The aim
behind such a fashion spectacle is for the consumer to loose themselves in a
fantasy world, as Guy Bebord describes ‘...for a world driven by false desires’
(1992, p.195). The fashion spectacle is used to seduce the audience and to gain
widespread media coverage and hype of the catwalk event, enhancing the brands identity.
The brand also gains cultural capital by showing that they have a knowledge and
appreciation for art and theater. This form of fashion show can be described as
monumental, seductive and fanciful.
![]() |
John Gallianos 1998 Spring-Summer Hourte Couture show for Dior |
The
fashion spectacle and hourte couture is often described as an art form. It is
seen as artwork due to its uniqueness, garments often being one off pieces, the
handcrafted quality of the garments, and the concept or message the designer is
emoting through the garments. All these elements make hourte couture more than
just clothing and is often form over function. Didier Grumbach,
President of the Fédération Française de la Couture, explains ‘The brands
that we all know were founded by artists who expressed themselves on the body
rather than on a canvas … In the end, fashion is an industry and the designer
has to compromise, but during a certain period of the designer’s life, it is
art, it must be art, if not, there is nothing and a brand cannot last.’ (Armed 2009) These factors distinguish
ready to wear, mass produced clothing from hourte couture and high end fashion
shows.
The
influence of art, hourte couture and the fashion spectacle on the fashion industry
has translated into still imagery and magazine advertisements. The theatrics and
mood of fashion shows is often carried through into magazine spreads and advertisements. Although it
looses the performance qualities of a live show, the advertisements have just
as much production behind them as the fashion shows. For example, it can be
seen in the magazine spread following John Gallianos 1998 Spring-Summer
Hourte Couture show for Dior (refer to image below) that the image is structured to resemble an eighteenth century painting and is overloaded with subject matter, much like the fashion show. This trend of fashion show I believe will change over time alongside popular culture, art movements and music. At present, this type of fashion show is necessary in the attempt to stay original and keep viewers interested in an image saturated world.
![]() |
A magazine spread from John Gallianos 1998 Spring-Summer Hourte Couture show for Dior |
REFERENCES
Amed, I 2009, Didier
Grumbach – Fashion’s creative pragmatist, viewed 27th October
2012 <http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/01/didier-grumbach-fashions-creative-pragmatist.html
>
Debord,
G 1992, Society of the Spectacle,
Zone Books, London.
Evans,C 2003, Fashion
at the edge, Library of Congress in Publication Data, Italy viewed 27th
October 2012 <http://books.google.com.au>
IMAGES
SOURCED FROM
Dior Couture, 2011 Tumblr viewed 26th October 2012 <http://suicideblonde.tumblr.com/post/26344999046/dior-couture-s-s-1998>
I like your point about the spectacle crossing over into fashion imagery - I think this is a really big thing because it is becoming much more common to see very theatrical spreads rather than just models photographed in a plain studio. It really helps to hold the attention of the audience, and it reaches a much larger audience as many people are more likely to look at imagery than go out of their way to see a runway show (those not involved in fashion, atleast).
ReplyDeleteVery interesting read!